-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2017
- April 2017
- October 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- February 2012
- February 2011
- November 2010
- August 2010
- November 2009
- November 1995
Categories
- Alexy
- balancing
- Dworkin
- Estrich
- European Court of Human Rights
- Freedom
- Gas et Dubois
- Habermas
- Hobbes
- Human rights
- I.A v. Turkey
- Individualism
- Liberalism
- liberal sociability
- Locke
- Mackinnon
- neutrality
- Okin
- Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria
- Personal Data
- Privacy
- Proportionality
- proportionality Balancing Human Rights
- Propotrtopnality
- Rawls
- religion
- Sappho
- Smith and Grady v. UK
- Weiler
- Αναθεώρηση
- Ανωνυμία
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα
- Βία
- Δίκαιο
- Διαδίκτυο
- Δικαιοσύνη
- Δικαιοσύνη. Δικαστές
- Δικαιώματα
- ΕΡΤ
- ΕΣΗΕΑ
- Ελευθερία έκφρασης
- Ελευθερία του Λόγου
- Ελευθερία του Τύπου
- Επικαιρότητα
- Ευρωπαϊκό Δικαστήριο Δικαιωμάτων του Ανθρώπου
- Ιθαγένεια
- Κράτος Δικαίου
- Λίστα Λαγκάρντ
- ΜΜΕ
- Μανδραβέλης
- Ομιλίες
- Πολιτική
- Πολιτική Ανυπακοή
- Ποτάμι
- Πράξη νομοθετικού περιεχομένου
- Προσωπικά Δεδομένα
- ΣτΕ
- Στεγη Γραμμάτων και Τεχνών
- Σύνταγμα
- Τύπος
- απεργία
- δημοσιογραφία
- δημοσιότητα δικαστικών αποφάσεων
- δημοσκοπήσεις
- δικαστές
- εξύβριση
- επετηρίδα
- μισαλλοδοξία
- προληπτικά μέτρα
- συνταγματικότητα
Category Archives: Papers
Nikiforos Panagis: Putting Balancing in the Balance
The importance of the principle of proportionality in assessing the lawfulness of a measure that interferes with individual rights is reflected in the fierce debates it has generated. The present essay will focus on the main issues that are … Continue reading
Disproportionate Individualism
A tale of two societies Since at least the publication of Alexis de Tocqueville’s famous work Democracy in America, common wisdom has it that the USA is par excellence an individualistic society.[1] The judiciary has had more than a … Continue reading
Posted in Papers
Tagged Dworkin, European Court of Human Rights, Freedom, Hobbes, Human rights, liberal sociability, Locke, Proportionality, Propotrtopnality, Rawls
2 Comments
Notes on liberal sociability
Is it possible to arrive at a concept of society (let alone a fair society) having a Hobbesian individualism as starting point? That is, starting with the notion that society is an aggregate of individuals who by nature have “a … Continue reading
Neutrality in the classroom
Dimitrios Kyritsis, Lecturer in Law at the University of Sheffield Stavros Tsakyrakis, Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Athens In Lautsi v. Italy the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights … Continue reading
Posted in Papers
Tagged Dworkin, European Court of Human Rights, Habermas, Liberalism, neutrality, Proportionality, Rawls, religion, Weiler
1 Comment
Disproportionate Individualism
When talking about human rights, many theorists in Europe and elsewhere prefer the term individual rights. I always considered this terminology unfortunate but contemporary human rights theory and practice, notably adjudication, makes it seem more apt. Indeed, the underlying philosophy … Continue reading
Total Freedom: the Morality of Proportionality
Stavros Tsakyrakis [1] Introduction Are the doctrines we employ in human rights adjudication true to the importance of human rights norms? This question is pressed upon us by the growing popularity, in recent years, of the proportionality test in many … Continue reading
Posted in Papers
Tagged Dworkin, European Court of Human Rights, Freedom, Human rights, Proportionality, Rawls, Smith and Grady v. UK
Leave a comment
Is there a general right of non-disclosure?
By Stavros Tsakyrakis[1] Introduction What information about ourselves do we owe each other? What information about ourselves are we justified to withhold from others? Do I have the right to keep my name secret or my face covered? What about … Continue reading
Posted in Papers
Tagged Dworkin, European Court of Human Rights, Human rights, liberal sociability, Personal Data, Privacy, Rawls
Leave a comment
I•CON Debate! Proportionality: An assault on human rights?: A rejoinder to Madhav Khosla
Stavros Tsakyrakis[*] In his interesting and thoughtful defence of proportionality, Madhav Khosla concedes that “certain types of balancing [are] objectionable”. He cites with approval the Israeli Supreme Court decision in Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, which affirmed a blanket … Continue reading
Proportionality: An assault on human rights?
Stavros Tsakyrakis[1] Balancing is the main method used by a number of constitutional courts around the world to resolve conflicts of fundamentals rights. The European Court of Human Rights routinely balances human rights against each other and against conflicting public … Continue reading